Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, with its exceptional global perspective, leads the legal response to cryptocurrency (especially USDT) fraud and cyber fraud. We work closely with well-known cryptocurrency platforms such as Coin, OKX, and Fire Coin Global. This not only enhances our expertise, but also enables us to respond quickly to our clients' needs. We bring together legal experts from around the world to provide efficient and professional cross-border legal support to every victim, utilizing our deep understanding of the international legal framework and our expertise.
Global Professional Services
Experienced legal team
Committed to maximizing customer protection
Frequently Asked QuestionsWe provide comprehensive legal advice and tailored solutions to clients worldwide, specializing in cryptocurrency investment fraud cases, including USDT-related scams, and are committed to providing efficient and personalized legal services. Enquiries
We can assist you in recovering your investment losses through cross-border litigation or arbitration proceedings and assist you in contacting the relevant law enforcement agencies for investigation.
We can help you evaluate the contract, claim invalidity or rescission, and initiate litigation or arbitration to protect your rights.
We can help you to report to the relevant regulatory authorities, to resolve the damage caused by false advertisements through the law, and to protect your legitimate rights and interests.
We can provide you with international criminal legal support to help you cooperate with the investigation and take the necessary legal action to mitigate potential liabilities.
Leveraging our team's years of industry experience and in-depth legal expertise, we specialize in all types of fraud cases, including cryptocurrency scams (e.g., USDT investment scams) and Internet fraud, and we strive to help our clients recover losses and maximize the protection of their rights.
Mr. Wang, a Chinese American living in San Francisco, is a freelance worker who regularly uses cryptocurrency for cross-border payments. In early 2023, he purchased a high-end laptop computer from an online marketplace. The seller asked for payment in USDT. Mr. Wang followed the seller's instructions and transferred USDT 3,500 to the wallet address he provided, but after making the payment, the seller delayed shipping the product and stopped responding to Mr. Wang's messages. A few days later, Mr. Wang discovered that the seller had blocked him and deleted his account on the platform. Mr. Wang realized that he might have been cheated and took action immediately.
Mr. Zhang, a tech entrepreneur living in Los Angeles, has a keen interest in cryptocurrency investment. He saw an advertisement on a well-known cryptocurrency forum promoting a program called CryptoGold. The project claimed to use advanced blockchain technology, had huge market potential, and promised to bring high returns to investors. Encouraged by the prospect of the program and a friend's recommendation, Mr. Zhang decided to invest $100,000 worth of Bitcoin (BTC). He transferred the funds to the wallet address provided by the program. However, a few months later, Mr. Zhang found that he was unable to withdraw his Bitcoin and the project's website was suddenly inaccessible. Mr. Zhang realized that he might have been scammed and immediately sought legal assistance.
Mr. Wang saw an investment advertisement for a virtual currency platform on the Internet, claiming high returns and quick profits. Mr. Wang invested US$500,000 and received a small return in the first few days, which strengthened his trust in the platform. However, when he tried to withdraw his funds, the platform demanded a “tax fee” and then disabled the withdrawal function. Eventually, the platform disappeared and the website became inaccessible.
Ms. Li received a phone call from an unknown number in which a “financial consultant” recommended a high-return investment project. The consultant claimed that with an investment of US$100,000, she would be able to make a 50% profit in three months. Ms. Li was invited to participate in the program, and the consultant gave her fake success stories and high return data. Ms. Li transferred the money to the designated account in a short time. However, a few months later, when she tried to withdraw her investment, the platform did not respond and she could no longer contact anyone.
Mr. Cheung, a customer, saw an advertisement on the Internet which claimed to provide quick loan services without collateral or guarantee. Through a simple application process, Mr. Cheung submitted his loan application and was soon informed that his application had been approved. However, he was told that he had to pay a US$100,000 “handling fee”. After making the payment, the loan amount never arrived and Mr. Cheung contacted the platform several times but received no response.
Ms. Chen applied for a position in an international company on a job platform. A few days later, she received an interview invitation email from the company, requesting a payment of US$2,000 for a “background check” and a “training fee”. After making the payment, Ms. Chen received no further information about the job and the company's website was down. In addition, there was no response to phone calls or emails.
The customer, Mr. Li, found a supplier claiming to sell goods on a wholesale basis on an international trading platform and entered into a purchase agreement. The supplier provided detailed product information and quotations and promised to ship the goods immediately after receiving the advance payment. Mr. Li paid 30% of the advance payment (US$100,000) in accordance with the agreement. However, after the payment was made, the supplier could not be contacted, nor could the platform, and the order was never shipped. Mr. Li tried to contact the supplier and the platform through various channels, but received no response.
Ms. CHAN saw a lucrative real estate project on a well-known real estate investment platform in the United Kingdom, promising an annualized return of up to 15%, which enticed her to make an investment. Through the platform, she contacted a person who claimed to be a real estate agent. Based on their advice, she transferred £25,000 of her investment into a designated company account. However, months passed and not only did she not receive any returns, but the platform was unresponsive. Customer service was slow to respond and eventually the platform disappeared completely.
Mr. Liu found a cell phone on an overseas e-commerce platform and paid US$2,000 through the platform's “Quick Pay” link. However, the seller failed to deliver the product on time after payment. Mr. Liu contacted the seller several times but to no avail, and the platform's customer service did not solve the problem. In addition, the seller's website is no longer accessible.
Mr. Chiu, the CEO of a medium-sized enterprise, plans to expand his company's market share overseas through mergers and acquisitions. Mr. Zhao signed a purchase agreement to acquire a high-tech company in Europe through an investment company claiming to have international M&A experience, with an investment amount of USD 50 million. According to the agreement, the investment company would assist Mr. Zhao in the acquisition of the company. Mr. Zhao paid a 50% deposit of US$25 million. However, after several months of waiting, the investment company did not make any real progress on the acquisition, and after Mr. Chiu's follow-up, communication became intermittent. Eventually, Mr. Zhao discovered that the investment company lacked real operational capability and had transferred funds to various offshore accounts.
Mr. Lee, an investor with a large amount of assets, heard that a foreign company had launched a high-return financial investment program that claimed to generate 20% annual returns through global equity portfolio management. The program attracted investors through its official website and overseas account managers. After several rounds of negotiation, Mr. Lee decided to invest US$20 million. He followed the platform's instructions to pay in three installments. However, after several months, Mr. Li did not receive any refund, the platform's contact information and customer service became unreachable, and the platform's website went offline. Mr. Li realized that he might have encountered a scam.
Ms. Wang runs a real estate development company in China and plans to expand her business overseas. After some research, she signed an investment agreement with a real estate developer in the United Kingdom through a foreign intermediary company, investing US$12 million in the purchase of a commercial property for development. The contract stipulated that the investment would be paid after the signing of the agreement, and the real estate project was expected to be delivered within one year. However, Ms. Wang did not receive any updates on the progress of the project after making the payment, and the developer did not deliver the property as agreed. After many unsuccessful communications, Ms. Wang decided to seek legal assistance.
Ms. Liu, a Chinese citizen, met a man who claimed to be a British businessman on an international dating website. After a year of online communication, the two decided to get married and Ms. Liu fully subsidized his visa application and other expenses in China. Ms. Liu fully subsidized his visa application and other expenses in China. After the man successfully obtained the visa, the two got married and lived together in China. However, shortly after the marriage, Ms. Liu found that the man suddenly went offline. Further investigation revealed that the man had been married several times before. Ms. Liu suspected that she had been cheated and decided to seek legal assistance.
Mr. Chen, a successful entrepreneur living in China, discovered after his wife's death that she owned $5 million worth of real estate in the United States. However, since his wife did not leave a clear will, Mr. Chen faced many legal obstacles in his inheritance matters. In particular, Mr. Chen's wife's relatives in the U.S. challenged Mr. Chen's inheritance rights, arguing that Mr. Chen had no inheritance rights. Mr. Chen decided to seek international legal support to protect his rights as a legal spouse.
Ms. Wang, a Chinese citizen, married her American husband in the U.S. and had a 5-year-old daughter. Due to cultural differences and conflicting lifestyles, their relationship gradually deteriorated and they eventually decided to divorce. Ms. Wang wanted to take her daughter back to her home country, but her husband insisted on keeping the child in the U.S. and demanded full custody. Ms. Wang decided to take legal action to obtain custody of her daughter and sought the help of Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP.
Mr. Liu, a Chinese citizen working in the U.S., had been married to his wife for many years and ran a business together. However, their relationship gradually deteriorated and his wife filed for divorce, requesting a division of the company's assets. Mr. Liu found that some of the claims filed by his wife in the U.S. court had unreasonable property claims and that some of the assets were not part of the couple's community property. Mr. Liu decided to seek cross-border legal assistance to protect his legal assets.
Ms. Zhang met a French man through an international dating agency and married him half a year later. After the marriage, Ms. Zhang found that her husband kept asking her to pay large sums of money for so-called “family expenses” and “investments”. She later discovered that her husband had transferred these funds into several private accounts, and that the marriage was in fact a well-planned scam. Ms. Cheung decided to take legal action to recover the money she had been cheated.
Mr. Wang, a Chinese American living in San Francisco, is a freelance worker who regularly uses cryptocurrency for cross-border payments. In early 2023, he purchased a high-end laptop computer from an online marketplace. The seller asked for payment in USDT. Mr. Wang followed the seller's instructions and transferred USDT 3,500 to the wallet address he provided, but after making the payment, the seller delayed shipping the product and stopped responding to Mr. Wang's messages. A few days later, Mr. Wang discovered that the seller had blocked him and deleted his account on the platform. Mr. Wang realized that he might have been cheated and took action immediately.
Mr. Zhang, a tech entrepreneur living in Los Angeles, has a keen interest in cryptocurrency investment. He saw an advertisement on a well-known cryptocurrency forum promoting a program called CryptoGold. The project claimed to use advanced blockchain technology, had huge market potential, and promised to bring high returns to investors. Encouraged by the prospect of the program and a friend's recommendation, Mr. Zhang decided to invest $100,000 worth of Bitcoin (BTC). He transferred the funds to the wallet address provided by the program. However, a few months later, Mr. Zhang found that he was unable to withdraw his Bitcoin and the project's website was suddenly inaccessible. Mr. Zhang realized that he might have been scammed and immediately sought legal assistance.
Mr. Wang saw an investment advertisement for a virtual currency platform on the Internet, claiming high returns and quick profits. Mr. Wang invested US$500,000 and received a small return in the first few days, which strengthened his trust in the platform. However, when he tried to withdraw his funds, the platform demanded a “tax fee” and then disabled the withdrawal function. Eventually, the platform disappeared and the website became inaccessible.
Ms. Li received a phone call from an unknown number in which a “financial consultant” recommended a high-return investment project. The consultant claimed that with an investment of US$100,000, she would be able to make a 50% profit within three months. Ms. Li was invited to participate in the program, and the consultant provided false success stories and high return figures. Ms. Li transferred the money to the designated account in a short period of time. However, a few months later, when she tried to withdraw her investment, the platform was unresponsive and she could no longer contact anyone.
Mr. Cheung, a customer, saw an advertisement on the Internet which claimed to provide quick loan services without collateral or guarantee. Through a simple application process, Mr. Cheung submitted his loan application and was quickly informed that his application had been approved. However, he was told that he had to pay a US$100,000 “handling fee”. After making the payment, the loan amount never arrived and Mr. Cheung contacted the platform several times but received no response.
Ms. Chen applied for a position in an international company on a job platform. A few days later, she received an interview invitation email from the company, requesting a payment of US$2,000 for a “background check” and a “training fee”. After making the payment, Ms. Chen received no further information about the job and the company's website was down. In addition, there was no response to phone calls or emails.
The customer, Mr. Li, found a supplier claiming to sell goods on a wholesale basis on an international trading platform and entered into a purchase agreement. The supplier provided detailed product information and quotations and promised to ship the goods immediately after receiving the advance payment. Mr. Li paid 30% of the advance payment (US$100,000) in accordance with the agreement. However, after the payment was made, the supplier could not be contacted, nor could the platform, and the order was never shipped. Mr. Li tried to contact the supplier and the platform through various channels, but received no response.
Ms. CHAN saw a lucrative real estate project on a well-known real estate investment platform in the United Kingdom, promising an annualized return of up to 15%, which enticed her to make an investment. Through the platform, she contacted a person who claimed to be a real estate agent. On their advice, she transferred £25,000 of her investment into a designated company account. However, months passed and not only did she not receive any returns, but the platform was unresponsive. Customer service was slow to respond and eventually the platform disappeared completely.
Mr. Liu found a cell phone on an overseas e-commerce platform and paid US$2,000 through the platform's “Quick Pay” link. However, the seller failed to deliver the product on time after payment. Mr. Liu contacted the seller several times but to no avail, and the platform's customer service did not solve the problem. In addition, the seller's website is no longer accessible.
Mr. Chiu, the CEO of a medium-sized enterprise, plans to expand his company's market share overseas through mergers and acquisitions. Mr. Zhao signed a purchase agreement to acquire a high-tech company in Europe through an investment company claiming to have international M&A experience, with an investment amount of USD 50 million. According to the agreement, the investment company would assist Mr. Zhao in the acquisition of the company. Mr. Zhao paid a 50% deposit of US$25 million. However, after several months of waiting, the investment company did not make any real progress on the acquisition, and after Mr. Chiu's follow-up, communication became intermittent. Eventually, Mr. Zhao discovered that the investment company lacked real operational capability and had transferred funds to various offshore accounts.
Mr. Lee, an investor with a large amount of assets, heard that a foreign company had launched a high-return financial investment program that claimed to generate 20% annual returns through global equity portfolio management. The program attracted investors through its official website and overseas account managers. After several rounds of negotiation, Mr. Lee decided to invest US$20 million. He followed the platform's instructions to pay in three installments. However, months later, Mr. Li did not receive any refund, the platform's contact information and customer service became unreachable, and the platform's website went offline. Mr. Li realized that he might have encountered a scam.
Ms. Wang runs a real estate development company in China and plans to expand her business overseas. After some research, she signed an investment agreement with a real estate developer in the United Kingdom through a foreign intermediary company, investing US$12 million in the purchase of a commercial property for development. The contract stipulated that the investment would be paid after the signing of the agreement, and the real estate project was expected to be delivered within one year. However, Ms. Wang did not receive any updates on the progress of the project after making the payment, and the developer did not deliver the property as agreed. After many unsuccessful communications, Ms. Wang decided to seek legal assistance.
Ms. Liu, a Chinese citizen, met a man who claimed to be a British businessman on an international dating website. After a year of online communication, the two decided to get married and Ms. Liu fully subsidized his visa application and other expenses in China. Ms. Liu fully subsidized his visa application and other expenses in China. After the man successfully obtained the visa, the two got married and lived together in China. However, shortly after the marriage, Ms. Liu found that the man suddenly went offline. Further investigation revealed that the man had been married several times before. Ms. Liu suspected that she had been cheated and decided to seek legal assistance.
Mr. Chen, a successful entrepreneur living in China, discovered after his wife's death that she owned $5 million worth of real estate in the United States. However, since his wife did not leave a clear will, Mr. Chen faced many legal obstacles in his inheritance matters. In particular, Mr. Chen's wife's relatives in the U.S. challenged Mr. Chen's inheritance rights, arguing that Mr. Chen had no inheritance rights. Mr. Chen decided to seek international legal support to protect his rights as a legal spouse.
Ms. Wang, a Chinese citizen, married her American husband in the U.S. and had a 5-year-old daughter. Due to cultural differences and conflicting lifestyles, their relationship gradually deteriorated and they eventually decided to divorce. Ms. Wang wanted to take her daughter back to her home country, but her husband insisted on keeping the child in the U.S. and demanded full custody. Ms. Wang decided to take legal action to obtain custody of her daughter and sought the help of Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP.
Mr. Liu, a Chinese citizen working in the U.S., had been married to his wife for many years and ran a business together. However, their relationship gradually deteriorated and his wife filed for divorce, requesting a division of the company's assets. Mr. Liu found that some of the claims filed by his wife in the U.S. court had unreasonable property claims and that some of the assets were not part of the couple's community property. Mr. Liu decided to seek cross-border legal assistance to protect his legal assets.
Ms. Zhang met a French man through an international dating agency and married him half a year later. After the marriage, Ms. Zhang found that her husband kept asking her to pay large sums of money for so-called “family expenses” and “investments”. She later discovered that her husband had transferred these funds into several private accounts, and that the marriage was in fact a well-planned scam. Ms. Cheung decided to take legal action to recover the money she had been cheated.
The moment I encountered the USDT cryptocurrency investment scam, I was at a loss and felt that I had lost all hope in my life. Luckily, I found this professional legal service organization. Not only do they have strong legal expertise, but they also have a unique understanding and extensive experience in the cryptocurrency field. They responded quickly, analyzed the case thoroughly, and customized a tailor-made solution for me. Thanks to their efforts, I was able to recover most of my losses. I am truly grateful!
“After encountering an investment scam, the team at Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP stepped in quickly and with their professional legal knowledge and efficient work style, they managed to help me recover a significant amount of my losses. Their professionalism and quick response made me feel very relieved. Thanks to Max, I have regained my confidence!
I was very pleased with the services of Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP! They provided me with specialized legal support and kept me informed of the progress by communicating closely with me at every stage of the case. In the end, I was able to recover the money I was defrauded of. I would like to thank Max's team for their professional handling and full assistance!
I was caught up in an emotional scam and felt very helpless, but the attorneys at Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP provided me with not only professional legal help, but also emotional care. Their support made me feel warm during this difficult time. In the end, I was able to recover my losses thanks to Max's team!
